Environmental Preference Schedule Of Construction Elements, page 2
ROOF INSULATION
cellulose, sheep's wool or hemp/cotton with thermal broken timber I beams
reused insulation boards
mineral wool and expanded polystyrene
PUR, foam insulation, extruded polystyrene
Choice: 4. 150mm Kingspan 2nds (PU foam) Reason: Price and practicality - lack of experience with I beams and construction concerns with a thicker roof, which would have been 300mm, if our preferred choice of cellulose had been used.
FLOOR INSULATION
Mineral wool,(glass wool & rockwool) Expanded polystyrene
Foamed glass
Perlite
Extruded polystyrene PUR
Choice: 4. 90mm extruded PU foam. Reason: We had planned to use expanded polystyrene but problems with floor levels left us with the choice of major amounts of underpinning or saving hight with the more efficient PU.
WALL INSULATION
cellulose, cork, wood fibre boards or hemp/recycled cotton
Mineral wool or EPS
Foamed glass
PUR, extruded polystyrene
Preferable to insulate outside existing structure and clad Choice: 1,2 & 4. Granary south facing walls; 140mm Pavatherm wood fibre boards
Outside east & north sides; Kingspan seconds. New build; 100mm of mineral wool Reason: Practicalities with Pavatherm proved quite testing and expensive. Though this experience would help with another project. In places space was very tight and this also influenced choice.
WALLS (new) External
Cob or earth, durable wood
reused brick or stone
new brick or concrete blocks made with recycled aggregate
Choice: 1 & 2. Reclaimed brick outer skin and Stranlite concrete blocks inner skin which are made with selected aggregates including graded bottom furnace ash and pulverised fuel ash. Reason: Principally the aesthetics of remaining in keeping with the associated buildings which the planners were keen on but also cost and experience with alternatives. We experimented with construction of the new lobby to WholeHealth using a timber frame with hemp lime in fill panels finished with lime and would like to try a Cob or straw bale construction next.
WALLS (new) Internal
Timber frame, clay block, cob or earth
Sand lime blocks, flue-gas gypsum blocks
Cellular Concrete blocks, natural gypsum blocks
Concrete, strong cement mortars
Choice: 1 & 4. We had chosen to use some new clay blocks from NTB but unfortunately they failed building control tests and we fell back to using concrete block and insulated timber frame with plasterboard. Reason: Clay block where thermal mass required otherwise timber stud.
TIMBER FRAME EXTERNAL WALL FINISHES
Rain screen of durable timber from sustainable source
Lime sand render on lightweight lath
Fibre/cement sheet rain screen
hard cement render/new brickwork screen
Choice: 1. Feather edge English Larch boards single nailed onto timber frame Reason: Ist choice, practical and affordable
INTERNAL WALL FINISHES
Local timber finish or lime-washed earth walls
Lime or clay plaster on masonry, timber lath or wood wool slab
Gypsum (natural or flue gas derived) plasterboard and plaster skim
MDF, plastic boards
Choice: 2 & 3. About half of the Granary was finished with lime plaster on either brick panels or woodfibre boards and half was plasterboard with gypsum skim. Reason: Our builders had reservations about using lime plaster but we found a local lime plasterer who did a great job and put to rest any fears. We used lime from Mike Wye in Devon who offered great support.
Design, Convert And Build Work contd.
Environmental Preference Schedule Of Construction Elements, page 2
ROOF INSULATION
Choice: 4. 150mm Kingspan 2nds (PU foam)
Reason: Price and practicality - lack of experience with I beams and construction concerns with a thicker roof, which would have been 300mm, if our preferred choice of cellulose had been used.
FLOOR INSULATION
Choice: 4. 90mm extruded PU foam.
Reason: We had planned to use expanded polystyrene but problems with floor levels left us with the choice of major amounts of underpinning or saving hight with the more efficient PU.
WALL INSULATION
Preferable to insulate outside existing structure and clad
Choice: 1,2 & 4. Granary south facing walls; 140mm Pavatherm wood fibre boards
Outside east & north sides; Kingspan seconds. New build; 100mm of mineral wool
Reason: Practicalities with Pavatherm proved quite testing and expensive. Though this experience would help with another project. In places space was very tight and this also influenced choice.
WALLS (new) External
Choice: 1 & 2. Reclaimed brick outer skin and Stranlite concrete blocks inner skin which are made with selected aggregates including graded bottom furnace ash and pulverised fuel ash.
Reason: Principally the aesthetics of remaining in keeping with the associated buildings which the planners were keen on but also cost and experience with alternatives. We experimented with construction of the new lobby to WholeHealth using a timber frame with hemp lime in fill panels finished with lime and would like to try a Cob or straw bale construction next.
WALLS (new) Internal
Choice: 1 & 4. We had chosen to use some new clay blocks from NTB but unfortunately they failed building control tests and we fell back to using concrete block and insulated timber frame with plasterboard.
Reason: Clay block where thermal mass required otherwise timber stud.
TIMBER FRAME EXTERNAL WALL FINISHES
Choice: 1. Feather edge English Larch boards single nailed onto timber frame
Reason: Ist choice, practical and affordable
INTERNAL WALL FINISHES
Choice: 2 & 3. About half of the Granary was finished with lime plaster on either brick panels or woodfibre boards and half was plasterboard with gypsum skim.
Reason: Our builders had reservations about using lime plaster but we found a local lime plasterer who did a great job and put to rest any fears. We used lime from Mike Wye in Devon who offered great support.
Next >> Environmental Preference Schedule Of Construction Elements, page 3
Designers and Engineers | Builders and Contractors | Specialist Suppliers